Ziga Sesko vs Matic Dimic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 10:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Sesko vs M. Dimic

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sesko 1 - 0 Dimic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ziga Sesko winning 2 and Matic Dimic winning 0. The last match between Ziga Sesko and Matic Dimic was at the M15 Slovenj Gradec, 25-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ziga Sesko getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sesko | 1 |
Dimic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Slovenj Gradec(09-25-25)
Z. Sesko vs M. Dimic H2H Profile
Z. Sesko vs M. Dimic Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance impact match outcomes? Matic Dimic has struggled, winning only 41.02% of second serve points over the last six months. In contrast, Ziga Sesko has excelled, securing 68.42%, suggesting a potential edge in this aspect.
- Analyzing return games, Dimic has managed to win 40.60% of points on opponents' second serves, slightly trailing Sesko who has 43.75%. Dimic, however, is significantly more effective at returning first serves, winning 33.83% compared to Sesko's 15.63%.
- When under pressure, Dimic has shown resilience, saving 46.58% of breakpoints faced. Remarkably, Sesko has yet to save a breakpoint in recent form, a critical vulnerability for tight matches.
- Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Dimic has won 44.83% of his matches, whereas Sesko’s performance is notably lacking, with no matches won out of his recent attempts.
- Why is surface performance important? Dimic's strongest surface is clay, with a win rate of 53%, with Sesko posting a win rate of 0% on clay, indicating Dimic’s clear advantage on this surface.
- Concerning player levels, both have mainly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Dimic has garnered considerably more success, unlike Sesko, who has not won any matches.
- In terms of opponent quality, Dimic has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 175.1, whereas Sesko's opponents average a rank of 739, indicating Dimic's experience against higher-ranked players.
- If this match extends to a deciding set, Dimic holds an advantage, having won 50% of such sets in the past year, while Sesko has not won any.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the upcoming match, several indicators suggest that Matic Dimic may have the upper hand over Ziga Sesko.
Dimic's ability to effectively return first serves and save breakpoints under pressure highlights critical advantages in tight situations. Additionally, his adeptness on clay—where the match is likely to be played—plays into his favor.
With Dimic's track record against superior opponents and his capacity to perform in deciding sets, it appears he is better positioned for success in this encounter.
Considering these elements, Matic Dimic emerges as the likely victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Ziga Sesko vs Matic Dimic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Sesko vs M. Dimic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:16:19 | Average Match Time | 1:16:19 |
67% (37/55) | 1st Serve % | 63% (32/51) |
62% (23/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (22/32) |
61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 16% (3/19) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
51% (26/51) | Return Points Win % | 38% (21/55) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Sesko Recent Matches Played
M. Dimic Recent Matches Played

Z. Sesko vs M. Dimic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
40.00% (4/6) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.05% (97/93) |
40.00% (8/12) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.16% (221/211) |
47.06% (80/90) | Games Win/Loss | 50.59% (2177/2126) |
75.00% (3/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (20/22) |
16.67% (1/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (76/68) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
21 | Aces Total | 227 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
15 | Total Double Faults | 232 |
1:20:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
395.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 252.46 |
61% (325/536) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3651/6050) |
62% (201/325) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2272/3651) |
49% (104/211) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1070/2399) |
39% (24/62) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (254/603) |
41% (203/498) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2409/5975) |
0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
40.00% (4/6) | Futures W/L | 51.32% (97/92) |
40% (4/10) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (97/190) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (18/44) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (25/52) |
100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (91/82) |
0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (91/9) |
0% (6/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (99/15) |